This Willy Wonka theory why Violet not Charlie should have won the chocolate factory went viral because it’s just so good
One of my biggest passions is over-analyzing works of fiction like this
— Shelby (@elanor_hosevelt) December 1, 2018
I always thought that the kids could each contribute to the factory. Augustus as a food taster. Mike TV would do research marketing. Verruca can provide nuts as well as help Violet deal with the competition and any one they’d have to do business with, they were the most ambitious
— 🔥Bern🔥 (@LovelywaytoBern) December 1, 2018
Nah… That lack of impulse control would’ve ruined Wonka. Either way, she ended up becoming like 62% juice. There’s no way that she survived beyond her 20s.
— Steven Wine (@id6klub) December 1, 2018
Everyone here is missing the point.
Violet is a character in a Roald Dahl book doing something Roald Dahl personally finds annoying.
This means she is a loathsome creature deserving only the fires of hell.
— Noah Washburn (@NoahWashburn1) December 1, 2018
These are all good BUT I think we are all missing ONE THING.
She like all the other participants ACCEPTED FAKE SLUGWORTHS OFFER to sell him the gobstopper formula!
Despite all of the “tests” that was the main morality test in the end!
— Willie Coleman III ✒ (@wcoleman3rd) December 2, 2018
yes, but this analysis has one critical flaw: it overlooks the fact that Wonka was a bloodlusted psychopath just looking to murder as many children as possible in a purpose-built Murder Mansion that would’ve made H.H. Holmes go, “dude, too far.”
— The History of China Podcast (@thocpodcast) December 2, 2018
This is the best drunk argument ever.
— You may call me NOPQR. (@navymig) December 2, 2018
But maybe the last word should go to the guy who originally shared it on Twitter.
Lol. People are really overthinking this. 😂
— James Ridgers (@englishguy) December 1, 2018